Monday, 12 March 2012

Allan's Blog 2


Allan Nicholson

Lifelong Learning Process

GSLL 6206 Sec 60

Blog Post #2

            For my second assignment, I have chosen my involvement as a volunteer with the Heart and Stroke Foundation of both Manitoba and Nova Scotia.  There was and there continues to be a basis for my participation with the valuable organization.  I have been a volunteer canvasser since 1992 (1992-1999 as a resident of the province of Manitoba) and (2007-2012) as a resident of my place of birth, Glace Bay, Nova Scotia. 

            I personally feel the Heart and Stroke campaign is an ongoing community of practice.  I felt as if I had to do this when I was initially approached to volunteer my services.  I remember feeling “somebody has to do the canvassing,” however, I did not feel obligated.  I had the opportunity to participate and I did not resent my decision.  This voluntary act is a refreshing sense of personal fulfillment.  We learn all of the time as mentioned in our class discussion and the majority of the time we learn in communities of practice.  In the book, Situated Learning-Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Lave-Venger say, “... learning involves the whole person; it implies not only a relation to specific activities, but a relation to social communities-it implies becoming a free participant, a member, a kind of person...learning  involves the construction of identities.” (pg.53)

            This method or state of learning is “learning as something special.”  It is not something learned in the school environment.  The individuals I am associated with make up or constitute a collaborative working group.  I am working in a community of practice.  In the social practice, there are different roles.  The Campaign Chairperson, the volunteer canvassers like me, and the generous people of the neighbourhood, the donors, are all participants in this community of practice.  Wayne, the Campaign Chairperson, has made me feel as if I belong to the Community of practice.  It is important and very satisfying.  I knew him as a colleague, but now we also communicate through our affiliation with this organization.

            It is obvious to me there is a good healthy negotiating in this community of practice.  There is a great deal of networking transpiring.  We are all trustworthy.  I have connected and developed relationships through conversations and stories.  I recently spoke with one of the donors who mentioned the upcoming demolition of her family home.  I was very aware that is was an old home.  She said it was her father’s home.  He recently died while in his one-hundred- and first year.  She also said it was the Bairncroft Orphanage before her father’s family purchased it.  I was not only contributing my time to a worthy cause, but learning a piece of history about my street as well.  I am adding a piece of myself every time through these conversations. I feel that I am a legitimate peripheral participant due to the connections I have made through the course of the campaigns.  Lave-Wenger mentions how “particular forms of apprenticeship can prevent rather than facilitate learning.” (Pg. 76)  “Gaining legitimacy” has not been difficult as I have been free to contribute as a peripheral participant. 

            I have also experienced and observed as to what a legitimate peripheral participant could be and should be from both of my parents.  I learned from both of them in a community of practice.  I saw how they contributed to society and the community itself.  I recall my father delivering chocolates to families in need at Christmas.  He was a member of the Glace Bay Kinsmen Club, “a newcomer’s tasks are short and simple...the apprentice has little responsibility for the activity as a whole.”(Pg.110)  My Mother was a consistent volunteer and a canvasser for several organizations relating to my “community of practice.”  She was also a member and reliable supporter of the Glace Bay Citizen’s Service League in both their Nursery School and Books on Wheels programs.  She as well was a legitimate peripheral participant due to her ability to trust people and her expertise in Community with them.  According to Lave-Venger, “acceptance by and interaction with acknowledged adept practitioners make learning legitimate and of value from the point of views of the apprentice.” (Pg. 110)




No comments:

Post a Comment